tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250971757379688937.post1791462568370536077..comments2012-04-15T10:05:32.264-04:00Comments on Smoke a Lot of Big Monkey Butt*: Hancock (2008, Peter Berg)Paul C.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02699493473242261477noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250971757379688937.post-39604905482720469212008-07-20T21:29:00.000-04:002008-07-20T21:29:00.000-04:00Ah-ha, you've got me there, Steve. But I still sor...Ah-ha, you've got me there, Steve. But I still sort of wonder whether or not Peter Berg would be a neo-con!Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08310290563393412068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250971757379688937.post-8757289218342221142008-07-16T13:42:00.000-04:002008-07-16T13:42:00.000-04:00But then, that's assuming there's any points of co...But then, that's assuming there's any points of contact between that screenplay and what ended up on screen. As I understand it, there aren't many.Steve C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01958138092537744506noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-250971757379688937.post-80430519224600202842008-07-14T16:38:00.000-04:002008-07-14T16:38:00.000-04:00I've seen a few people read this as a sort of neo-...I've seen a few people read this as a sort of neo-con allegory, and I looked for it, but didn't detect it. Certainly it could be interpreted that way, but since the script originated back in 1996, I'm thinking the parallels just lined up well.Jameshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08310290563393412068noreply@blogger.com